Multimedia Workshop Course Project Rubric Due Week 10, Day 7
Definitions of Ratings: Quality Indicators
5 = Acceptable as written, the level of scholarship demonstrates critical thinking and a mastery of all crucial elements 4 = Acceptable as written, all crucial elements are included and adequately described 3 = Approved, although revisions are strongly suggested in one or more important component(s) that are of markedly lesser quality than the rest of the quality indicators in this section 2 = Must be revised and resubmitted because one or more essential component(s) are not satisfactorily described 1 = Must be revised and resubmitted because one or more required element(s) are missing or previous requests for revision were ignored NA = Not Applicable. This quality indicator does not apply to the document.
Multimedia Workshop Course Project (135 points)
Module 1: Planning the Multimedia Workshop (20 points)
Working Wiki: Created a wiki as a workspace
Presentation Wiki: Created a wiki for the presentation of the completed workshop
Invitation: Sent invitation to Instructor to join Working and Presentation Wikis
Participants: Identified the workshop participants
Comments: (click here®)
Topic: An engaging topic that requires the development of an authentic, problem-based project by your participants was selected and posted in the Working Wiki.
Comments: (click here®)
Outcomes: A draft of your workshop outcomes was created (may be revised later; in Working Wiki).
Comments: (click here®)
Gap: You indicated the gap between what you think your participants know and what you want them to obtain in the workshop (in Working Wiki).
Comments: (click here®)
Module 2: Designing the Multimedia Workshop (15 points)
Authentic Assessment: You identified the project your participants will create in the workshop for the assessment of the workshop. This project requires the use of multimedia tools (in Working Wiki).
Comments: (click here®)
Agenda: You developed a tentative agenda for a 5-hour workshop, and placed it on page 1 in your Working Wiki. You included the time allotted for each activity (in Working Wiki).
Comments: (click here®)
Activities: You sketched a pre-training activity, your presentation, and an idea for a graphic organizer for modules 3–5 (in Working Wiki).
Comments: (click here®)
Modules 3–5: Creation of Multimedia for Workshop (60 points)
Authentic Assessment: The directions for this activity were clearly spelled out so participants could complete the activity without much assistance from you (in Working Wiki).
Comments: (click here®)
Authentic Assessment: A tutorial was developed that shows how to use the multimedia tools your participants are using in the authentic assessment, including screen captures or screencasts (in Working Wiki).
Comments: (click here®)
Authentic Assessment: Your authentic assessment is based on Mayer's theory of active processing and meets all the criteria of active processing.
Comments: (click here®)
Authentic Assessment: Participants developed a multimedia product to demonstrate their learning in the workshop, using a variety of online resources.
Comments: (click here®)
Authentic Assessment: Your authentic assessment required collaboration among a small group of the participants, and was developed by the group during the workshop. You described your procedures for putting your participants in small groups.
Comments: (click here®)
Pre-Training: You created a pre-training activity to introduce the key concepts for your workshop using multimedia tools (in Working Wiki).
Comments: (click here®)
Presentation: Your presentation demonstrated your understanding of Mayer's principles of dual coding and limited capacity in its creation.
Comments: (click here®)
Presentation: You demonstrated appropriate multimedia presentation skills in the creation of your presentation (video, PowerPoint, Podcast, screencast, interactive tutorial, or other).
Comments: (click here®)
Presentation: Your presentation demonstrated best practices for multimedia and engaged the participants in meaningful learning throughout the workshop (in Working Wiki).
Comments: (click here®)
Graphic Organizer: You developed a GO for your participants to use to obtain key skills and information from your presentation (in Working Wiki).
Comments: (click here®)
Assessment Rubric: You created a detailed rubric to review the authentic assessment project your participants created (in Working Wiki).
Comments: (click here®)
Workshop Evaluation/Rubric: You created an evaluation form (rubric) for your participants to assess the effectiveness of your workshop (in Working Wiki). Comments: (click here®)
Miscellaneous Considerations (30 points)
The following are included in your work plan in your Working Wiki:
List of technology and equipment needed for presentation (projector, screen, laptops, other?)
List of resources needed for workshop (your responsibility to bring)
List of resources provided by site
List of online applications you will use in workshop
Other?
Comments: (click here®)
In the media you created for your workshop, you used at least three of the four categories of media presented in the multimedia. You used:
Graphics and text
Text to audio, or audio to text
Video, animations, and cartoons
Virtual worlds
Other?
Comments: (click here®)
You included all the handouts you expect to use in your Multimedia Workshop.
Comments: (click here®)
The multimedia materials developed for this workshop met the multimedia principles of Mayer:
Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing
Comments: (click here®)
The multimedia materials developed for this workshop met the multimedia principles of Mayer:
Principles for Managing Essential Processing
Comments: (click here®)
The multimedia materials developed for this workshop met the multimedia principles of Mayer:
Principles for Fostering Generative Processing
Comments: (click here®)
Presentation of Workshop in Presentation Wiki (10 points)
You have included the following in a creative and logical order in your Presentation Wiki:
Agenda
Handouts
Pre-training activity
Presentation of key concepts and skills
Graphic organizer
Authentic assessment assignment
Rubric for authentic assessment
Tutorial for tools used in authentic assessment
Workshop evaluation
Media embedded in your Ning
Other?
Comments: (click here®)
Presentation Wiki: Everything you need to conduct your workshop is included in the Presentation Wiki, so participants will have access to the materials after the workshop ends.
Due Week 10, Day 7
Definitions of Ratings: Quality Indicators
5 = Acceptable as written, the level of scholarship demonstrates critical thinking and a mastery of all crucial elements
4 = Acceptable as written, all crucial elements are included and adequately described
3 = Approved, although revisions are strongly suggested in one or more important component(s) that are of markedly lesser quality than the rest of the quality indicators in this section
2 = Must be revised and resubmitted because one or more essential component(s) are not satisfactorily described
1 = Must be revised and resubmitted because one or more required element(s) are missing or previous requests for revision were ignored
NA = Not Applicable. This quality indicator does not apply to the document.
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
- Graphics and text
- Text to audio, or audio to text
- Video, animations, and cartoons
- Virtual worlds
- Other?
Comments: (click here®)Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Comments: (click here®)
Total Points